Camunda vs Flowable: Choosing Your Process Engine
A detailed comparison of Camunda Platform 8 and Flowable for enterprise process automation. Features, architecture, licensing, and decision criteria.
Camunda vs Flowable: Choosing Your Process Engine
Both Camunda and Flowable are mature, production-ready process automation platforms. They share common ancestry (Activiti) but have evolved differently. This comparison helps you choose the right platform for your requirements.
Platform Overview
Camunda Platform 8
Camunda Platform 8:
├── Architecture: Cloud-native, distributed (Zeebe engine)
├── Licensing: Source-available (Camunda License), SaaS, Enterprise
├── Execution Model: Asynchronous job workers
├── Scaling: Horizontal (add brokers/workers)
├── Primary Use: High-throughput process orchestration
└── Target: Cloud-native microservices architecturesFlowable
Flowable:
├── Architecture: Embedded Java engine
├── Licensing: Apache 2.0 (Community), Commercial (Work/Engage)
├── Execution Model: Synchronous/Async executors
├── Scaling: Vertical (larger JVM) + clustering
├── Primary Use: Traditional BPM and case management
└── Target: Java/Spring applications, traditional enterpriseFeature Comparison
BPMN Support
| Feature | Camunda 8 | Flowable |
|---|---|---|
| BPMN 2.0 Core | ✅ Full | ✅ Full |
| Service Tasks | ✅ Job workers | ✅ Java delegates |
| User Tasks | ✅ Tasklist | ✅ Built-in + custom |
| Call Activities | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| Multi-Instance | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| Event Sub-processes | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| Compensation | ⚠️ Manual | ✅ Native |
| Transaction Sub-process | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Supported |
| Signal Events | ✅ Via messages | ✅ Native |
| Escalation Events | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Supported |
DMN Support
| Feature | Camunda 8 | Flowable |
|---|---|---|
| DMN 1.3 | ✅ Supported | ✅ DMN 1.1+ |
| Decision Tables | ✅ Full | ✅ Full |
| Hit Policies | ✅ All | ✅ All |
| Literal Expressions | ✅ FEEL | ✅ JUEL/MVEL |
| Decision Requirements | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| Standalone Evaluation | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
CMMN Support
| Feature | Camunda 8 | Flowable |
|---|---|---|
| CMMN 1.1 | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Full support |
| Case Management | ⚠️ Via BPMN patterns | ✅ Native |
| Discretionary Items | ❌ N/A | ✅ Supported |
| Planning Tables | ❌ N/A | ✅ Supported |
Forms
| Feature | Camunda 8 | Flowable |
|---|---|---|
| Form Builder | ✅ Camunda Forms | ✅ Flowable Forms |
| Custom Forms | ✅ External forms | ✅ Custom renderers |
| Form Versioning | ✅ With process | ✅ With process |
| Dynamic Forms | ⚠️ Limited | ✅ Supported |
Architecture Comparison
Camunda 8 Architecture
Camunda 8 (Distributed):
Client App Zeebe Cluster Workers
│ │ │
│ gRPC/REST │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Start │────▶│ Broker │◀────▶│ Worker │
│ Process │ │ Broker │ │ Worker │
│ │ │ Broker │ │ Worker │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────┐
│Elasticsearch│ (History/Search)
└─────────────┘
Characteristics:
- Brokers replicate data via Raft consensus
- Workers poll for jobs (async)
- No shared database needed
- Horizontally scalableFlowable Architecture
Flowable (Embedded/Clustered):
Application Cluster Database
│ │
▼ ▼
┌─────────────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ App Instance 1 │ │ │
│ ┌───────────────────────┐ │ │ PostgreSQL │
│ │ Flowable Engine │ │◀──▶│ (Shared DB) │
│ │ - Process Engine │ │ │ │
│ │ - DMN Engine │ │ │ - Process data │
│ │ - CMMN Engine │ │ │ - History │
│ └───────────────────────┘ │ │ - Jobs │
└─────────────────────────────┘ │ │
│ │ │
▼ │ │
┌─────────────────────────────┐ │ │
│ App Instance 2 │ │ │
│ ┌───────────────────────┐ │◀──▶│ │
│ │ Flowable Engine │ │ │ │
│ └───────────────────────┘ │ │ │
└─────────────────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
Characteristics:
- Embedded in application
- Shared database for clustering
- Async executor for background jobs
- Vertically scalable primarilyPerformance Characteristics
Throughput Comparison
| Metric | Camunda 8 | Flowable |
|---|---|---|
| Process instances/sec | 10,000+ (distributed) | 1,000-5,000 (single node) |
| Horizontal scaling | Linear | Limited (DB bottleneck) |
| Latency (p99) | 10-50ms | 5-20ms (embedded) |
| Cold start | N/A (always running) | Sub-second |
When Performance Differs
Camunda 8 excels when:
├── High throughput required (>1000 processes/sec)
├── Processes are long-running with many wait states
├── Multiple services need to orchestrate work
└── Cloud-native deployment is required
Flowable excels when:
├── Low latency is critical
├── Processes are short-lived
├── Tight integration with Java application
└── Simpler operational model preferredLicensing and Cost
Camunda
Camunda Licensing:
Community Edition (Zeebe):
├── Source-available (Camunda License)
├── Free for development and internal use
├── Restrictions on offering as managed service
└── Limited to Zeebe engine (no Operate, Optimize)
Self-Managed Enterprise:
├── Full platform (Operate, Tasklist, Optimize)
├── Commercial license required
├── Annual subscription based on cores/clusters
└── Starting ~$50K/year (varies by deployment)
SaaS (Camunda Cloud):
├── Fully managed
├── Pay-per-use or reserved capacity
├── Starting ~$1K/month for small workloads
└── Scales with usageFlowable
Flowable Licensing:
Community Edition:
├── Apache 2.0 License
├── Fully open source
├── Complete BPMN, DMN, CMMN engines
├── No restrictions on commercial use
└── Community support only
Work (Enterprise):
├── Commercial license
├── Advanced modeling tools
├── Enterprise support
└── Contact for pricing
Engage (Low-code):
├── Commercial license
├── Citizen developer platform
├── Pre-built applications
└── Contact for pricingIntegration Capabilities
API Comparison
| Capability | Camunda 8 | Flowable |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✅ Full | ✅ Full |
| Java API | ⚠️ Client SDK | ✅ Native |
| gRPC | ✅ Primary | ❌ No |
| GraphQL | ❌ No | ⚠️ Community |
| WebSocket | ❌ No | ✅ Supported |
Ecosystem Integration
Camunda 8 Connectors:
├── REST Connector (HTTP calls)
├── Kafka Connector
├── AWS (SQS, SNS, Lambda)
├── Google Cloud (Pub/Sub, Functions)
├── Slack, SendGrid, etc.
└── Custom connectors via SDK
Flowable Integrations:
├── Spring Boot (native)
├── Spring Security
├── JPA/Hibernate
├── Message queues (JMS, AMQP)
├── Email (JavaMail)
└── Custom via Java delegatesOperational Considerations
Deployment Complexity
| Aspect | Camunda 8 | Flowable |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum components | 3 (Gateway, Broker, Worker) | 1 (Embedded) |
| Database required | Elasticsearch (optional) | RDBMS (required) |
| Kubernetes support | Helm charts available | Standard deployment |
| Docker support | ✅ Official images | ✅ Official images |
| Operational complexity | Higher | Lower |
Monitoring and Observability
Camunda 8 Observability:
├── Operate (process monitoring)
├── Optimize (analytics)
├── Prometheus metrics
├── Structured logging
└── OpenTelemetry support
Flowable Observability:
├── Admin application
├── History service queries
├── JMX metrics
├── Spring Actuator integration
└── Custom dashboards neededDecision Framework
Choose Camunda 8 When
✅ High throughput (>1000 processes/second)
✅ Cloud-native/Kubernetes deployment
✅ Microservices orchestration
✅ Long-running processes with many wait states
✅ Need for horizontal scaling
✅ Polyglot workers (Node.js, Go, Python)
✅ Managed service preferred (SaaS)Choose Flowable When
✅ Open source requirement (Apache 2.0)
✅ CMMN case management needed
✅ Embedded engine in Java application
✅ Lower operational complexity preferred
✅ Traditional enterprise deployment
✅ Budget constraints
✅ Tight Java/Spring integrationAvoid Camunda 8 When
❌ CMMN is required
❌ Tight Java embedding needed
❌ Very low latency critical (<5ms)
❌ Simple, low-volume workflows
❌ No Kubernetes/cloud infrastructureAvoid Flowable When
❌ Need >5000 processes/second
❌ Cloud-native architecture required
❌ Non-Java workers needed
❌ Managed service required
❌ Horizontal scaling criticalMigration Considerations
From Camunda 7 to 8
Migration Path:
├── Process models: Re-export with Zeebe extensions
├── Java delegates: Convert to job workers
├── Expressions: JUEL → FEEL
├── History queries: API changes
├── Forms: Migrate to Camunda Forms
└── Effort: Significant rewriteFrom Camunda 7 to Flowable
Migration Path:
├── Process models: Minor adjustments
├── Java delegates: Similar patterns
├── Expressions: JUEL compatible
├── History queries: Similar API
├── Forms: Rebuild in Flowable Forms
└── Effort: ModerateKey Takeaways
-
Architecture drives choice: Camunda 8 for distributed/cloud-native, Flowable for embedded/traditional
-
CMMN is Flowable only: If adaptive case management is required, Flowable wins
-
Scale requirements matter: Camunda 8 scales horizontally, Flowable scales vertically
-
Licensing flexibility: Flowable Community is truly open source, Camunda's Zeebe has restrictions
-
Operational complexity: Flowable is simpler to deploy and operate
-
Ecosystem maturity: Both have strong communities and commercial support options
The choice isn't about which is "better"—it's about which architecture and licensing model fits your requirements. Many organizations use both: Camunda for high-throughput orchestration, Flowable for embedded case management. \